Credit Crisis?
Sure, we’re in a credit crisis, in fact anyone that doesn’t acknowledge that we’re in a recession is deeply in denial. There is a fix, and it can be done by the same folks that caused the problem in the first place. Congress…
We all know that the American consumer (along with Congress) is woefully too far in debt and buried under various loan payments. We are talking about expensive cars, mortgages, and excessive credit card debt. This huge debt load is also bringing about the destruction of the family unit that made this country so fabulous. Everyone has to work and bring in some income. It’s rare that I meet someone whose spouse is not also holding down a full-time job, in fact there are some families where one spouse is holding down two jobs (that’s three incomes, if you have trouble with the math). All right, so what did Congress have to do with this?
There was a time when all loan interest was tax deductible, sadly, I don’t know the history of that, so I don’t know how long it was in effect. However it was used to spur the economy. You could deduct your car loan interest, credit card interest, mortgage interest, and virtually any other interest you paid to borrow money. This certainly spurred the economy – we bought all kinds of stuff. It wasn’t long before the marketing gurus got involved and pressed the public with all kinds of ideas about what they needed to be successful and beautiful. We began to borrow more, spend more, and worked very hard to “keep up with the Joneses.” It was a nice environment, really… you could treat loan money as free. After all, who was paying the interest? Congress! Well, as you can guess, it wasn’t long before our elected officials wanted the same treatment. I can just picture them asking each other, “Who do we get to pay the interest on our excessive spending?” “We can’t tax the public, they’ll throw us out of office.” “I know… let’s let the IRS take the blame.” And the interest tax deduction was removed for all interest except mortgages. Congress got their income, and families took on two jobs.
So, here’s the easy credit crisis fix: Restore the tax deduction on all loan interest. Cars, homes, credit cards, RVs, planes, trains, whatever you can get a lender to loan. We’ll have a lot more spendable income (certainly more than the silly $600/person relief program that is coming your way). The only bad part is that the government will lose a lot of tax income. Well, that’s not so bad, here’s the fix for that…
Congress… eliminate pork barrel spending. And that’s not hard to do, just stop promising your campaign contributers that you’ll send money their way! There’s nothing that I would like better than to have a legislator that will promise to do nothing, and that no new laws would be implemented without first removing two stupid laws in it’s place. Need more ways for the government to cut back on spending? Eliminate the IRS through the adoption of Fair Taxation legislation.
Of course, for any of that to work, all of us need to be a little bit less greedy. We need to stop doing business with companies with unfair business practices… like raising your credit card interest rate whenever you add a credit card, or default on someone else’s card. Banks should only adjust rates based on your performance with their card. Ah well, that’s another post, someday… Greed.
March 15, 2008 at 5:12 pm
The “credit crisis” is not one fixed by legislature. It is Greed. The desire to have more than what we have. To the extreme.
Changing the legislature won’t change the unhealthy desire of people’s hearts. That has to come from the inside.
March 16, 2008 at 8:57 am
Rob – Granted, greed is a major factor, but it’s “change” that causes crisis. Many of the changes are beyond our immediate control, i.e., divorce, family tragedies, medical emergencies, job losses, and so on, however Congress changed the loan interest tax deduction in the beginning… leading to the various steps of this crisis. Certainly, without greed, the financial crisis we’re witnessing now would NOT have happened.
March 17, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Ok, the problem with giving interest deductions for Americans is that it is not the interest that is in jeopardy. It is the equity of the collateral. So many Americans participated in these purchases by promising their homes, and other equitable items of value in order to move ahead.
Then there is the issue with over extension of this equity. The lenders for the past 5 to 10 years were forecasting the economy based on the historical performance of the market, which in theory works, unless there is some indeterminable factor in the equation.
The major markets in America (Automobiles, Homes/Land, Oil) have all been estimated by these lenders at their future worth or (NFV). This future worth did not include the withholding of oil by countries effected by the wars int he middle ease, nor the home seller taking advantage of the “seller’s market” in such a way that the appraised value of a home would be inflated to double its actual value.
Combine these factors with the natural disasters which have plagued this country for the past 10 years, and it is the recipe for depression. Now, the foresight of these events can be said to have been determined, although, no one would bet on so many negatives coming into play all at once.
The way that the country will recover from this one does not have to do with interest, because the lenders do not have the money or equity to lend. It is going to come down to a level of independence from those factors which have moved the market in the first place.
Congress does not need to band-aid the problem by giving tax cuts, but rather provide stricter controls and regulations for the seller end of the mortgage contract, as well as the appraiser’s responsibility.
The next thing is to focus on the phasing out of oil consumption a a short term institution of this plan. The American dependence on the middle east has out stayed its welcome, and we need to be able to survive without the cost of blood and oil which currently plagues this country.
As for automobiles, well I say that they are the first ones to put forth the effort to reconstruct this country in a more economically independent fashion. So maybe congress should take a lead from the developers of the hybrid cars, and find out why they were able to determine the move ahead of the finance pros.
March 17, 2008 at 4:39 pm
I think you missed the whole point. This isn’t a question of an interest crisis, the financial institutions have figured out long ago how to charge usurious rates. When they can’t call it interest, they drum up some sort of “fee” to charge to compensate.
This crisis is one where the consumer no longer has the funds/cash to put into the economy to keep the economy going. I maintain that if the IRS re-instituted the interest deduction, people would find they had spendable cash. With respect to another persons comment, I agree that spending probably is not the smart thing for most consumers to do.
Any bank that blames oil withholding as the problem must not be staffed by anyone over the age of 30! Remember the oil crisis of the ’70s? It was the worst shortage of gasoline since WWII. Banks are as greedy as any company, and greedier, even then most consumers. It is bank/credit card company marketing that provides so much incentive for folks to become greedy.
Forget about trying to praise the auto companies for their foresight. GM had developed electric/hybrid cars 20 years ago! They took them off the market, presumably because no one would buy them. (Google it, the whole story is out there.) There are no “White in shinning armor knights” running companies… only people that can get their companies stock to rise. If it won’t sell, they aren’t going to make it, no matter how good it is for the world, country, or people.
The financial crisis that is taking place inside the financial industry is simply one of mistrust. No bank will buy loans from other banks for fear that the selling bank is hiding bad loans in the portfolio. It has NOTHING to do with available money, only available trust — and there ain’t none.
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but taxation is a related problem and solving it with additional government regulation is NOT the answer. You need to Google the Fair Tax Initiative and read up on it (as I need to do, also). It’s been my 60 years of experience, that we get fairer, better, and more economical results by ditching government involvement and relying on market principles. The single, HUGE CAVEAT, is that good results will only come from honest marketing, valid consumer needs, and a lack of greed on the part of the manufacturers and the consumers. Neither of which is likely to happen in my estimation.
Did you not notice how quickly people reacted to the “Made in China” issues when the market took hold. It certainly was not the result of any effort by the protective agencies within our government.
Along with that… for market influences to work correctly the consumer has to know about the issues. And the consumer will NEVER find out from a news media that is financed through the sale of market advertising. In the 1950s we had reliable, honest news reporting, financed by the sale of that news. No more. It has become so expensive that advertising is used to offset the cost of providing us news. Hence, it HAS to be tainted.
We need to get back to buying our news. Not the products that are advertised in the news media. It will be expensive, but the value of honest, reliable, informed news is worth it. And if you don’t agree with me, ask anyone that has ever listened to the news on PBS and see if they don’t hold it far above any other news source.
You put forth some interesting thoughts, and I greatly appreciated the opportunity to read them. Keep them coming!
Thanks!
Musist
March 31, 2008 at 12:27 pm
Well, the president agrees with me so there!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23880336/
I jest in my sarcasm, but, um … well, he does agree with me after all.